CPA Is Here Whether We Like It Or Not

Committee creation is the critical part of the process.

Let me state clearly here, I did not not vote for the Community Preservation Act. To me it is a tax poorly disguised as community initiative.

None of that matters now. The CPA passed, it is here and a fact of life in Salem. Sometime after the New Year a committee will have to be formed to administer the program. This committee will be established by ordnance or by-law. The ordnance or by-law will also define the term lengths for committee members.

This will be done by the city council with input from the Mayor's office.

This committee is required by statute to have a minimum of five members. Those five  must be "designated representatives of the following five municipal boards: the Conservation Commission, the Planning Board, the Historical Commission, the Housing Authority, and the Board of Park Commissioners."  There can be no deviation from this.

The city is allowed to seat up to four additional members. These can be drawn at the" discretion of the community and can be from the public, from local government, or from other municipal boards or committees." 

Simply put the committee can be as few as the five required members, or it can be six, seven, eight or nine members.

The four additional members can be either appointed, or elected. That is where this gets interesting. 

How many, if any additional members should be added to the required five? Should they be appointed or elected?

It would preferable to see the committee comprised of the maximum of nine members. The more debate and input involved in the decisions to be made the better those decisions will be for the city and the more informed the public will be. 

The additional four members should not be drawn from any current elected or appointed boards or commissions. This committee should represent the community as broadly as possible. The best way to insure constant and across the board community input would be to draw the four members from the community itself. 

These four positions can be "appointed or elected at the discretion of the community."

Let's put them on the ballot. 

If the community is truly to have a consistent voice in how the CPA funds are allocated what better way is there than to hear the voice of the people during the election cycle? By having these four positions on the ballot we will have a fresh and honest public conversation on where and how the monies are being allocated every time we vote.

The election may be over, but there is still debate to come and decisions to be made. Your opinion and your voice can still be heard.

Don't let silence rule the day. Let your voice be heard and maybe this CPA thing won't be the monster that many of you believe it to be.


windpower November 13, 2012 at 10:56 PM
Thanks Bill I stand corrected
John Merrett November 14, 2012 at 12:26 AM
A Government big enough to give you everything you want, Is big enough to take everything you have.
John Merrett November 14, 2012 at 12:29 AM
Socialism fails because eventually you run out of other peoples money.
Carolyn Costain November 14, 2012 at 01:24 AM
I like how my truthful comment was edited out, when it was " a fact" that I was lied to by the person bringing around the petition that this would not cost the home owners in property tax or cause any tax to go up! I did not sign it anyways! We have 3 boards that should be handling this in our city ,"so why are they going to create another board to cost us more money in property taxes?"
Antoine M. Boisvert November 16, 2012 at 12:49 AM
I like the CPA. And its in. I could explain why I like it, but why waste my breath? So have fun whining about it. Buh-bye.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »