Burlington Town Meeting Approves Moratorium on Medical Marijuana Dispensaries
Town Meeting unanimously approved a 17-month moratorium on any applications for medical marijuana dispensaries in town.
Burlington Town Meeting voted unanimously last night to approve a moratorium, put forward by the Planning Board, on medical marijuana dispensaries in town.
The moratorium would prohibit any application for a marijuana dispensary until June 30 of 2014.
The rational for the moratorium, explained Planning Director Kirsten Kassner, was to give the town time to come up with regulations and to give the State Department of Public Health time to provide its regulations and recommendations.
According to the law, which was passed as a ballot initiative during the Nov. 6, 2012 election, the Department of Public Health has 120 days to come up with regulations on the state level.
The Planning Board recommended a moratorium, rather than a prohibition, because prohibitions have a history of being successfully challenged when are applied to legal activities.
As explained by Kassner at the Jan. 3 Planning Board meeting, other towns have taken one of three approaches: doing nothing, a moratorium or outright prohibition. However, because voters made the dispensaries legal, she said, there are risks of trying prohibition as such action would likely fail to stand up in court. She said that other towns who have passed rules prohibiting marijuana dispensaries are facing the possibility of those ruling be overturned at the state level.
"Wakefield and Reading went with prohibition and we’ve heard from the Attorney General that the Reading bylaw is already having trouble," she said. "It has been flagged and held."
The same argument about the weakness of prohibition laws was also brought up at a recent Board of Selectmen meeting when Town Administrator John Petrin likened that track to previous moves by communities to block adult entertainment. Those prohibitions were successfully challenged and municipalities found themselves unable to regulate where such entities could open.
There were some questions by Town Meeting members on the necessity of passing the moratorium. One member asked if the vote could be postponed until May, after the regulations from the state are developed and released.
Planning Board Chairman Paul Roth said any delay could open the town to either the possibility of having to approve an application or, at the least, a lawsuit if it fights one. He explained to Burlington Patch after the meeting that despite the state has 120 days to pass regulations, it is still possible for applicants to come forward. He said an applicant could try and argue that a dispensaries should be allowed by right in the general business district because the November election made dispensaries legal.
“This is protection for the town,” he said. “If an application comes in next week they could try and put it anywhere and we’d have to fight it. This is no way diminishes Town Meeting's input."
"I hope you support this," he added, stating that there are a lot of entities who believe this will be a big business. "Do not underestimate the band of attorneys ready to try and get a foot in the door."
There are aspects of the law that the moratorium does not address, Roth explained after the meeting. Those include people purchasing marijuana out of town and bringing it home and people growing marijuana in their homes for personal use. Perhaps most importantly the question of how and if the schools will be able to regulate marijuana use in the schools if a student is prescribed it for medical purposes. Burlington Patch will focus on that question next and will be in contact with school officials for a follow-up.
What do you think? Do you support the moratorium? Do you think Burlington should attempt a prohibition, zoning regulations or simply allow dispensaries? Let us know in the comments below.
JulesMosco
10:16 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
I was on the fence for prohibition but after reading this post, it makes sense to approve. I am glad we are able to wait until 2014, until regulations are put in place.
FlyingTooLow
11:29 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
So much for the decision of the voters.
You've been over ridden by the town council.
Pathetic!
Northguy
12:07 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
FlyingTooLow: Are you even from Burlington or have any idea as to its structure of government? If you are or do, you should know that, Burlington being a statutory town, has no "town council", and that decisions made in Town Meeting can only be overridden by referendum. You might want to take a few minutes to inform yourself with facts before making empty and uninformed comments.
FlyingTooLow
12:12 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
@Northguy...
You are right...many thanks for pointing out my error.
I will try to mend my lowdown ways.
Burlington Resident
12:47 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
I can’t believe this was on the ballot and passed in the first place. Most of these people who voted for this think they will get an easy prescription from the doctor’s office so they can get their weed.
Reader99
3:43 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
After reading in the paper this past weekend that many towns have already decided not to allow the sale at all in their towns I don't know why we don't do the same.
Petefresh
4:19 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Granted I'm not from Burlington. But I'd suggest the citizens become better informed about the pros and cons of the mmj issue. Its been legal for 13 years now and quite a few towns are reaping the benefits and not seeing the doom and gloom the naysayers predicted. In a small town with a struggling economy and the almost inevitable closing of your prison. Y'all should be welcoming ANY new source of revenue. Especially from the fastest growing industry in the state. But hey, its your town. Do whatever you want.
Burlington Resident
7:44 am on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Prison closing? Struggling economy?
I think you have the wrong town buddy. Try laying off the pot for a while to clear your head.
Jeff Levy
4:36 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
It is silly for the Planning Board to try to thwart what is obviously the expressed will of the people!
John Novak
4:53 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Why are our state legislators deliberately muddying the medical cannabis water here? I-502 is for RECREATIONAL USE. Medical cannabis laws passed almost 15 years ago! GET A CLUE
Sara A
1:03 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
I was born and bred in Burlington. This is another unfortunate mistake taken by Town Meeting members who don't know any better and/or are uninterested in their constituents; another instance of Burlington politics where the decision was taken without an official announcement of a public hearing on this topic with either the Planning Board or in the context of Town Meeting. Disappointing.
The only people this moratorium helps is to give the Selectmen and their cronies time to figure out how to get their sticky fingers (no pun intended) into this business so they can make the money, as they sit and chat at Dunkies. And the property developer that built all the homes in the '70s & '80s who still has an office at the end of Mall Road... can't recall his name right now.
It only hurts the town itself, who won't reap the financial benefits of having a dispensary. It could revitalize the dying parts of Cambridge St or be well-placed near the Lahey.
Hopefully it won't hurt Burlington's patients that need their medicine legally, who may well be able to grow their own as a result of this moratorium or seek caregivers.